Mai Ahmed Fatty “The Gambia is NOT a Secular State”

By Yusef Taylor, @FlexDan_YT

The leader of the Political Party Gambia Moral Congress, GMC recently remarked that “The Gambia is a NOT a secular Republic” in response to a debate on The Gambia’s secularism as a new constitution is being developed. His statement was a response to a question by Karamba Touray on Gambia’s secular status  I am interested in how all you good folks believe we should handle this matter in the New Constitution.” Below are the statements from Mai Ahmed Fatty and Karamba Touray. Join the discussion. Let us know how you think this matter should be handled.

On 25th October, Mai Ahmed Fatty released this statement on his Facebook account.

“Yesterday, my brother Karamba Touray ignited an animated debate about secularism. Brilliant minds including brother Malick Kah, my comrade Coach-Pasamba Jow, the resident political analyst Musa Jeng and prominent pundits like the erudite Natta Mass etal, as usual did justice to the matter. Contrary to the contention of many, including some lawyers, who continue to wrongfully contend that The Gambia is a secular state, I asserted with categorical inference, that The Gambia is NOT a secular Republic. I promised to return to prove this today, due to scarcity of time attributing to my prior commitments. I am here to fulfill that promise. Once more, I shall be laconic due to time constraints.

Seventeen years ago, the then Gambian Minister of Justice & Attorney-General introduced a Bill in Parliament (Act No. 6 of 2001,) to amend Section 1 of the 1997 Constitution of The Gambia. Parliament subsequently passed the bill into law on the 15th May 2001, and former President Jammeh signed his assent on the 25th May 2001.

Now Read This:  Gambia: KAIRO NEWS – President Barrow Promises Massive Infrastructural Interventions In Banjul, KM

Subsequently, Hon. Kemesseng Jammeh filed a writ of summons against the Attorney-General at the Gambia Supreme Court, invoking its original jurisdiction to declare that amendment not only null and void, being of no legal effect, but also a declaration that the promulgation of the law by both the National Assembly and the President was ultra vires. The case reference is S.C.C Suit No. 4 of 2001.

It’s imperative to note that prior to the said amendment, the original wording of Section 1 of the 1997 Constitution reads: “The Gambia is a Sovereign Republic.” The amendment sought to insert the word ‘secular’ between “Sovereign” and “Republic”, to read: “The Gambia is a Sovereign Secular Republic”.

The matter was set for legal arguments before a very eminent panel of five distinguished Justices of the Gambia Supreme Court. The gravamen of Hon. Jammeh’s contention was that Section 1 of the Constitution was an entrenched provision and therefore could not be amended through a normal process. It required amendment exclusively via a national referendum, and that the combined powers and authority of both the National Assembly and the President CANNOT alter that constitutional imperative. Since the government was attempting to surreptitiously change an entrenched provision of the Fundamental Law through the back-door, the unconstitutionality must be resisted. The Attorney-General raised untenable preliminary legal objections bordering on jurisdiction and more, with remarkable failure.

Now Read This:  ICC trains TRRC staff, police officers on witness protectionSelect staff of the Truth, Reconciliation and Reparations Commission (TRRC) and some close protection officers of The Gambia Police Force have benefitted from a two-week intensive Witness Protection training for investigators by the International Criminal Court. The training, whose first phase ended on Friday, September 13, was organized by the TRRC with support from the UNDP and facilitated by experts from the International Criminal Court (ICC). Asked what necessitated the training, the Deputy Director of Research and Investigations at the TRRC, Superintendent Abdou A. Manneh, also a lawyer, indicated that witness protection is a critical aspect of their work. “The TRRC Act mandates us to provide protection for our witnesses and informants. Currently, there is no witness protection unit in The Gambia, and we have been relying on our staff to provide witness protection for our witnesses that are determined through a risk assessment matrix to be at some level of risk. This training is the first phase of what we hope will be a series of trainings that will lead to the establishment of a functional witness protection unit that will ensure that all witnesses of the TRRC and hopefully those that will be part of the judicial process, will feel safe and secure. This training is a first step in that direction” The training was attended by 25 participants drawn from the Gambia Police Force, staff from Psychosocial, Youth and Children’s Network, and Research and Investigations units of the TRRC. The trainers are from the ICC with a vast knowledge of dealing with witnesses all over the world. The Chief of Victims and Witnesses Section of the ICC and one of his Senior Managers also flew in to initiate conversations on establishing a witness protection program here in The Gambia. Asked about the training, Alagie Barrow, Director of Research and Investigations for the TRRC indicated that “…this training is long overdue. We have an obligation to each and every individual that steps foot or interacts with the TRRC. We must make sure that this interaction does not become a burden on their life or welfare. We have had witnesses that we had to provide protection for and the weight of someone’s life in your hands is a very heavy weight to bear when you are not as prepared as you possibly should be. Thankfully, we have been able to take care of all those witnesses and ensured their safety and security. But this training will better equip us to be in a better position to protect our witnesses for the TRRC and hopefully for the larger Gambia,” Barrow concluded. Speaking at a brief closing and certification ceremony, TRRC Executive Secretary Dr. Baba Galleh Jallow, thanked the ICC Witnesses and Victims Section and their resource persons for rendering much needed and important support to the Commission. He called on the TRRC staff who benefitted from the training to use their newly acquired knowledge and skills to protect all witnesses that come to the TRRC. Post Views: 39 Gainako Newspaper

On the 29th November 2001, the five eminent Justices of the Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY held that the amendment was unconstitutional, ultra vires, null and void, and of no legal effect. It struct off the word “Secular” from the provision for fatal irregularities. The significance of this landmark decision is that Section 1 of the 1997 Constitution reverts to its original provision: “The Gambia is a Sovereign Republic”. Now this brings me to my irrefutable assertion that The Gambia is NOT a secular state. I am pleased to refer you to [1997 – 2001] GR 839, where the case was legally dissected in extenso. That means the existing 1997 Constitution is silent over the matter of secularity, and there is growing public opinion that it should remain so, without being disturbed. Excuse the typos – am in a rush.”

GMC Congress Billboard

The statement which sparked the debate from Karamba Touray is copied below

“In the last week I have heard some religious figures namely Alhagie Ousman Jah (Hajj Amir) on GRTS and Sheikh Chebbo Cham one of the leading Salafi voices and another oustass whose name I can’t remember each decry their opposition to the designation of a Gambia in the new constitution as a secular state . Their argument is that the designation could theoretically prohibit the teaching of religion in public schools and forbid the general expression of religion within the institutions of government. I cannot imagine how that can happen in a country with nearly 95 % Muslim population. On the other hand how would an independent Gambian court adjudicate a constitutional case brought forward by a determined atheist who says he doesn’t want oustasses attached to our public schools paid from the treasury? In free and democratic Gambia, courts charged with interpreting the constitution can be expected to do just that. Do we settle for a compromise designation that says “Gambia is a democratic republic” where sovereignty lies in the individual citizens? This may leave the status quo in place and remove the controversial secular word. I suspect this would be a contentious battle. Religious conservative are manoeuvring to frame their position as one that defends religion and casting proponents of secular designation as people who oppose religion itself. And proponents would see any attempt to modify the designation as a creeping altering of the bulwark of our diversity. I am interested in how all you good folks believe we should handle this matter in the New Constitution.”

Now Read This:  Detained Gambian Wanted To Carry Out Terror Attack In Exchange For €1,500

The post Mai Ahmed Fatty “The Gambia is NOT a Secular State” appeared first on GAINAKO.

Gainako Newspaper

Sharing is caring !